Carbohydrate digestion begins in the mouth with an enzyme called amylase.  Saliva mixes with your food as you chew it, and the amylase in saliva begins breaking down carbohydrates into simple sugars.  Amylase is also produced by the pancreas and used for further breaking down carbs in the small intestines.

Amylase isn’t the only enzyme involved in breaking down carbohydrates; it is just the first step.  Amylase helps convert starches eventually into maltose or maltotriose, which are then converted by the enzymes maltase into glucose in the small intestines. Glucose then is utilized by the body for energy production.   (Vampire bats are the only mammals not to produce maltase)

Amylase is coded for by the genes AMY1 in the saliva, and AMY2A and AMY2B in the pancreas.  These genes vary widely in the number of copies of the gene that a person can have.  For example, AMY1 can vary between 2 and 17 copies, thus giving a wide variation in the amount of amylase a person normally secretes in their saliva. [ref]

Several studies that have found that low AMY1 copy numbers are associated with higher BMI.[ref] [ref] [ref]  In contrast, a large study published in Nature Genetics in 2015 found no association between amylase copy numbers and BMI.  Part of the discrepancy may be differences in diet in the populations; perhaps it is a mismatch between the percentage of carbs in the diet and the ability to break down carbohydrates that causes an increase in BMI.

Other interesting studies:

  • Cellulose can inhibit amylase activity. [study] This makes me wonder if the presence of cellulose gum in so many processed food products makes a difference in how we break down processed foods?
  • Tannins in sorghum reduce amylase activity. [study]  Tea polyphenols also inhibit amylase. [study]
  • Lower amylase activity is associated with higher reliance on fatty acids for energy. [study]
  • Higher amylase activity was associated with lower blood glucose concentration after eating starch in a small study (14 people). [study]

23andMe and Ancestry data do not give copy number variation information, but several studies have linked specific SNPs to higher or lower amylase activity and copies of the gene.

AMY1-AMY2 
A couple of studies note that rs11185098 is associated with amylase activity. The studies show that the  A allele has higher amylase activity and the G/G genotype has the lowest amylase activity.[ref] [ref] [ref]

study looking at the effects of different weight loss diets over a two year period found that those with higher amylase activity (carriers of the A allele for rs11185098) were less likely to regain the weight that they had lost. Those that carried the G allele tended to regain weight. This study was interesting because it showed that the type of diet (low carb, low fat, high protein, etc) did not have an effect on weight loss based on amylase activity.

Another study linked a tendency towards higher carbohydrate and starch intake to those with the A allele, but, at least in a Caucasian population, those with the minor (A) allele also had a lower overall caloric intake. [study]

Check your 23andMe results for rs11185098 (v.4 only):

  • A/A: higher amylase activity
  • A/G: intermediate amylase activity
  • G/G: lower amylase activity

 


Lifehacks

There are many digestive enzyme supplements available that contain amylase.  One brand that I like is Enzymetica, but there are other good brands as well.

Coming back to the study referenced above that found that cellulose inhibits the amylase enzyme… If you eat processed or packaged foods (like most everyone does), you are likely eating a lot more added cellulose that you think.  Check out the labels, and take a look at my article on emulsifiers and your gut microbiome.

It may be worth experimenting with your diet based on your amylase production — perhaps reducing the proportion of carbs in a meal if you are a low amylase producer would make a difference in how you feel after the meal? Experiment and see if replacing some of the carbs with lower carb alternatives makes a difference.


5 Comments

Robin · October 29, 2017 at 12:36 am

Hi! Thank you for this interesting article.
I have rs11185098 GG and I’ve noticed that I don’t do well with digesting things like grains and beans and it’s much easier for me to lose weight and maintain my weight loss eating a low carbohydrate diet.

    genelife · October 30, 2017 at 2:31 pm

    Thanks for reading the article! Isn’t it cool to see how genes play a role in which foods work best :-) I’m a high amylase producer and feel like I could do just fine eating potatoes and rice for every meal (not that I’m going to do that!). It’s nice to know that there are good reasons why a diet works well for one person and isn’t a great fit for another.
    Debbie

Selina · July 25, 2018 at 10:38 pm

Thanks for offering this useful information. I’m rs11185098 GG too so I can keep to my low carb preferences with confidence and stop taking guilt trips when a few pounds go on.

Roy Aldridge · January 17, 2019 at 1:25 pm

Excellent post, I’ve been wondering about this relationship between salival amylase and BMI sometime now; specially because there are studies that shows positive and some others negative association. That makes me think that the problem is about the reaction that this fast breakdown from complex to simple carbs makes in our bodies:
– In some studies, the association was lower BMI in higher AMY1 activity; but if you dig in those studies: normal weight participants with high insulin levels from seconds you start to chew, and then they have less glucose levels at following exams (in comparison of lower AMY1). Probable addaptation to starchy foods (but the question is… What’s the signal to increase insulin production? Gut microbiote? (but it’s before the digest foods arrives there) A signaling from gustatory cells to a healthy and responsive pancreas?.
– Other studies shows the inverse association, but they are groups involved in other studies; so probably not the best pool of patients; those shows that lower BMI is associated with lower AMY1 expression. Probably because less absortion of simple sugars, the problem here is that are groups that are already in nutritional advice; so probably the expression of genes may be modified.

It’s an excellent topic, probably we’ll know more about this soon.

    Debbie Moon · January 18, 2019 at 12:04 pm

    Hi Roy –
    Thanks for your thoughtful comment here. It is a fascinating topic and one that I need to revisit – especially the research on the insulin response.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Related Posts

Diet / Gene Interaction

Problems with IBS? Personalized solutions based on your genes

We tend to take happy bowels for granted — until something goes awry!  For many people, a daily battle seems to wage in their intestines. Pain, discomfort, bloating, diarrhea and/or constipation — known as IBS Read more…

Diet / Gene Interaction

CBS Genetic Variants: Should you eat a low sulfur diet?

Sometimes when you are getting started with learning about a new topic, such as genetics and the methylation cycle, it is easy to jump on board with whatever is being parroted by the experts who Read more…

Diet / Gene Interaction

Is fasting right for your genes?

There are many internet docs and nutritional gurus promoting fasting as a way to lose weight and get healthy. The recommendations are often for intermittent fasting, for example, a 24-hour fast every week, or sometimes for Read more…