There is a lot of buzz online about MTHFR variants and the need to avoid folic acid. I’ve seen recommendations ranging from avoiding all processed foods that are fortified with folic acid — to recommendations that people with MTHFR variants need to take extra folic acid.
Should you take folic acid if you have MTHFR variants?
I’ve dug into the topic to see what is in the research studies about folic acid. Is it so evil that everyone should go out of their way to avoid it? Or is it a wonderful benefit for women trying to conceive?
How is folic acid different from folate?
Folic acid, a synthetic form of folate (vitamin B9), remains both temperature and pH stable, allowing for easy addition to processed foods and multivitamins. The chemical name for folic acid is pteroylmonoglutamic acid or PteGlu.
Natural folates from foods differ a bit from synthetic folic acid. Because natural folates contain more than one glutamic acid, they are called pteroyl polyglutamic acid. They are less heat stable, and cooking or processing can decrease the amount of natural folate in foods.[ref]
The body converts folates (folic acid and natural folates from plants) into tetrahydrofolate. This conversion is a little different for natural folate vs. folic acid.
A 2014 review in Preventive Nutrition and Food Science explained the breakdown of folic acid:
- First, folic acid must be reduced to dihydrofolate by using the DHFR enzyme.
- Secondly, the DHFR enzyme converts dihydrofolate into tetrahydrofolate (the active version used by the body).
Tetrahydrofolate, along with the MTHFR enzyme, is required in a critical step within the methylation pathway. This vital pathway’s responsibility includes creating the methyl groups needed in DNA synthesis, detoxification reactions, the creation of certain neurotransmitters, and more.
How is folic acid different from methylfolate?
While folic acid has to go through a couple of reactions to become the active form of folate used by the body, methylfolate (L-5-methyltetrahydrofolate) skips all those steps and can be used immediately. Methylfolate is available in supplemental forms; it isn’t added to fortified foods, in part because it is quite a bit more expensive than folic acid.
What happens to folic acid that isn’t used by the body?
Often when reading about folic acid, you will see it mentioned that it is a non-toxic, water-soluble vitamin. This may lead some to assume that extra folic acid won’t hurt you. But this may not be a correct assumption.
The unused folic acid can often be found in the bloodstream as unmetabolized folic acid. There are concerns that excess folic acid could inhibit the DHFR enzyme from converting dihydrofolate into tetrahydrofolate when the body is needing it. Both reactions use the DHFR enzyme, but most of the time, the enzyme is preferentially used for creating the active form (tetrahydrofolate) when needed. Some studies indicate too much unmetabolized folic acid, though, inhibits DHFR from completing that second reaction. This could leave cells lacking in tetrahydrofolate when high levels of folic acid are in circulation.[ref]
There are also concerns that excess folic acid intake could downregulate folate transporters in the kidneys and intestines.[ref]
How much folic acid does it take to get unmetabolized folic acid in the bloodstream?
- One study shows the level is around 400μg for the average adult.[ref]
- Another study completed in the UK, which had not mandated fortification of flour, meant the participants had no unmetabolized folic acid in their bloodstream prior to beginning the study. The study found around 200 μg doses would show up in the bloodstream. The timing was also important, and repeated exposures close together had a cumulative effect.[ref]
- Finally, a 2012 study examining the effects of supplementing with either 1.1mg or 5 mg of folic acid found a great variation in people’s capacity for metabolizing folic acid.[ref]
How much folic acid are people eating?
In the US, flour is fortified at 140 mcg/100g. But since I have no idea how many grams of flour are in most foods, let’s take a look at servings of some popular foods[ref]:
- A bowl of cheerios gives you 50% of the daily value for folic acid (200mcg?)[website]
- Two slices of bread for a sandwich give you 70 mcg.
- A bagel contains 119 mcg.
- 1 cup of macaroni gives you 179 mcg.
- 1 cup of enriched white rice gives you 200 mcg.
This is just folic acid — many foods contain natural folate as well.
A study of over 2,700 US children, adolescents, and adults found unmetabolized folic acid in almost all blood samples.[ref]
Does folic acid cause cancer?
This is a question that researchers have been looking into for a few decades. It’s a controversial topic without totally clear answers.
The mandating of folic acid fortification in 1998 has been theorized as causing an increase in the number of colon cancer cases in the US. The sharp increase in colon cancers from 1998-2002 came after a long period when colon cancer rates had been declining.[article][ref]
Recent studies show folic acid in higher amounts, such as 1mg/day, has links to breast cancer, prostate cancer, and colon cancer.[ref]
High amounts of unmetabolized folic acid are also associated with decreased natural killer cells (a cytokine that is part of the body’s defense against cancer).[ref]
One commonly used cancer-fighting drug is methotrexate, which blocks the action of an enzyme (DHFR) that is part of the folate pathway. This essentially inhibits the synthesis of DNA, RNA, and more in cancer cells — and healthy cells.
Here are a few of the studies on cancer and folic acid:
- A study of 848 women with breast cancer and a control group of 28,345 women without cancer found premenopausal women with higher plasma folate levels were at a higher risk of breast cancer. The study was to determine if B12 and folate prevented breast cancers; researchers noted the results were ‘unexpected’.[ref]
- Another study found women with higher plasma folate levels (top third) were at double the odds of ERβ− breast cancer.[ref]
- An animal study investigated folic acid’s effect on breast cancer. Animals with mammary tumors received a diet containing higher amounts of folic acid (2.5 to 5 times the recommended amount) for 12 weeks. Compared with the animals fed a control diet, the folic acid fed animals had significantly larger tumors.[ref]
- A 2009 randomized placebo-controlled trial for colorectal adenomas found folic acid supplementation (1 mg/day) more than doubled the risk of prostate cancer. “Among the 643 men who were randomly assigned to placebo or supplementation with folic acid, the estimated probability of being diagnosed with prostate cancer over a 10-year period was 9.7% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 6.5% to 14.5%) in the folic acid group and 3.3% (95% CI = 1.7% to 6.4%) in the placebo group “.[ref]
Don’t freak out or just stop eating folate altogether... folate in the right amounts has been repeatedly shown to reduce the risk of getting cancer. The key here seems to be that adding folic acid when there is cancer already present will increase the growth of cancer.
Does folic acid cause autism?
This is another controversial topic without a clear answer.
A meta-analysis that combined together data from a bunch of studies showed the overall effect of supplementing with folic acid while pregnant is that it reduces the risk of autism.[ref]
Other studies, though, raise some serious questions about folic acid on an individual level. A study of 1,391 mothers in Boston found high maternal folate and/or B12 levels significantly increased the risk of autism in their children. Overall, though, women using multivitamins were at a lower risk. The researchers did factor in MTHFR genetic variants and found they were not a risk factor.[ref]
Mouse studies also raised questions about the impact of higher levels of folic acid during pregnancy. The results showed high folic acid during pregnancy leads the offspring to have disturbed choline/methyl metabolism, memory impairment, and embryonic growth delays.[ref]
History of how Folic Acid came to be supplemented in the US:
Widespread folic acid fortification began in the US in 1996 and then became mandatory in 1998. It is currently added to all “enriched bread, flour, cornmeal, rice, pasta, and other grain products”.[ref] This mandate was made to reduce the risk of neural tube defects, which happened at the rate of 2,500 babies with NTD/year in the US in 1992. A 2015 CDC article claims: “The birth prevalence of NTDs (proportion of babies in the population born with an NTD) has decreased by 35% in the United States since folic acid fortification was required in 1998.”[ref]
The history of the FDA’s decision to mandate fortification with folic acid is interesting to read. It states that:
“Folic acid fortification, for all practical purposes, was not even on the regulatory horizon when it was first included in the 1990 Nutrition Labeling and Education Act (NLEA). FDA scientists at the time felt that the charge to consider the link between folic acid and neural tube defects literally came “out of the blue.” Later, they concluded it probably started with a science workshop hosted by CDC in the late 80s in which unpublished data on folic acid and neural tube defects were presented and seized upon by the supplement industry.” The article goes on to explain that a British study published in 1991 showed women who already had a child with neural tube defects reduced their risk of having a second child with NDT when they supplemented with 4 mg of folic acid per day. This study was in contrast to the FDA contracted report in 1991, which stated that studies had failed to show the connection between folic acid and NTD.
By August of 1992, the FDA had changed its stance on folic acid. The article goes on to say:
“In August and September 1992, FDA reviewed results obtained from two additional, unpublished studies, and worked closely with authors and journals publishing them to ensure that the results were made public early. The first, a Hungarian research study, showed a reduced risk of ntd’s in women consuming .8 mg. of folic acid as part of a multivitamin/mineral supplement. The study had been conducted with a sample of women in the general population without a previous history of an ntd pregnancy. The second study was a case-control study of women in the general population of Boston, Toronto, and Philadelphia and was referred to as the “Werler study.” This study suggested that .4 mg. of folic acid daily from multivitamin/mineral supplements was associated with a reduced risk of ntd. It also suggested that a diet adequate in folate with more than .25 mg. daily was protective. The new preponderance of scientific evidence on folic acid created a platform from which the Public Health Service (PHS) spoke on September 14, 1992. PHS formally recognized the link between folic acid intake and ntd’s as a compelling public health issue. It recommended that all women of childbearing age should have adequate folate intakes (.4 mg. daily) throughout their childbearing years, but warned that the total intakes should not exceed 1 mg.”
The Werler study that the FDA used for their recommendation looked at 436 cases of NTD with a control group of 2,615 babies that had other types of birth defects. They based the conclusion on the reported use of daily multivitamins containing folic acid. I admit I am confused by this study, specifically by why the control group was only babies with birth defects and how the conclusion was reached that it was the folic acid in the multivitamin that lowered the risk of NTD.
Please don’t get me wrong… I am not really questioning a link between NTD and folate levels since there is other evidence for this. The CDC estimates folic acid fortification in the US prevents 1,300+ cases of NTD each year.[ref] (You can decide if it is a good trade-off for possibly increased cancer risk.)
Rather, I’m surprised at how little data the FDA used in making the decision to force the fortification of folic acid on the public. I had rather naively assumed there were lots of good studies showing without a doubt that 400 μg/day of folic acid was exactly what we all needed.
Folic Acid Genotype Report:
Not a member? Join here. Membership lets you see your data right in each article and also gives you access to the member’s only information in the Lifehacks sections.
DHFR – Dihydrofolate reductase gene variants:
The DHFR gene codes for the enzyme that converts dihydrofolate (from folic acid or folate) into tetrahydrofolate. It also converts folic acid into dihydrofolate.
Check your genetic data for rs70991108 (23andMe v5 only):
- I/I orTGGCGCGTCCCGCCCAGGT: normal DHFR variant
- D/I: carrier of one copy of a deletion in part of the DHFR gene
- D/D or -/-: carrier of two copies of a deletion in part of the DHFR gene, more unmetabolized folic acid[ref]
Members: Your genotype for rs70991108 is —.
The deletion (above) is quite common and is found in almost half the population. Studies are mixed as to the effect of the deletion:[ref]
- One study showed that people with two copies of the deletion were twice as likely to have unmetabolized folic acid when intake was over 500mcg/day.[ref]
- The deletion is also linked to an increased risk of breast cancer in multivitamin users[ref], which may point to its effect with higher folic acid supplementation.
- In the elderly, those with two copies of the deletion and higher folate levels had significantly worse memory scores[ref], which again points to a detrimental effect from folic acid for those with the deletion.
Check your genetic data for rs1677693 (23andMe v4; AncestryDNA):
- T/T: decreased risk of colon cancer only for people not taking folic acid supplements[ref]
- G/T: decreased risk of colon cancer only for people not taking folic acid supplements
- G/G: typical (most common)
Members: Your genotype for rs1677693 is —.
The study referenced above looked at colon cancer cases in the US, Canada, and Australia. The rs1677693 T-allele was associated with a decreased risk of colon cancer — but only in people not taking vitamins with folic acid in them. But note that these people were probably all getting some folic acid through fortified foods.
Check your genetic data for rs1650697 (23andMe v4, v5; AncestryDNA):
- A/A: alters the effect of methotrexate on psoriatic arthritis[ref]; decreased DHFR expression[ref]; likely to live longer when being treated for lung cancer[ref]
- A/G: alters the effect of methotrexate on psoriatic arthritis[ref]; decreased DHFR expression
- G/G: a more common variant
Members: Your genotype for rs1650697 is —.
MTHFR is a well researched genetic variant in the folate pathway. It converts tetrahydrofolate into methyltetrahydrofolate for use in the methylation cycle.
Check your genetic data for rs1801133 (23andMe v4, v5; AncestryDNA):
- G/G: typical
- A/G: one copy of C677T allele (heterozygous), MTHFR efficiency reduced by 40%
- A/A: two copies of C677T (homozygous), MTHFR efficiency reduced by 70 – 80%
Members: Your genotype for rs1801133 is —.
While at first glance, it may seem that people with MTHFR 677 and 1298 variants may gain some kind of benefit from folic acid as long as their DHFR gene is working well, this may not be the case. The studies on high levels of unmetabolized folic acid decreasing the conversion to tetrahydrofolate would indicate that people with MTHFR variants would be at an increased risk for not having enough active folate for the methylation cycle. So caution may be warranted on not taking high doses of folic acid regularly if you have the MTHFR variants.
Another recent study showed that, regardless of MTHFR status, [6S]-5-MTHF (methyl folate) had higher bioavailability than folic acid.[ref]
Here are some common-sense applications for this research.
Figure out how much folic acid you get in a day:
I think caution is warranted for higher doses of folic acid, especially in older people or anyone at a higher risk for cancer.
The question remains whether a “higher dose” is 200 mcg or 400 mcg since the studies referenced above showed different answers for the point at which unmetabolized folic acid is found. My guess is that for anyone with a DHFR variant, that is on the lower side.
Check your multivitamins, prepackaged shakes, vitamin drinks, etc., to see how much you are getting.
What about prenatal vitamins?
The research is pretty clear that women trying to conceive during the first trimester need plenty of folate, but this doesn’t mean that folic acid is your only option. There are many options now for prenatal vitamins with methylfolate rather than folic acid.
What about MTHFR?
Limiting folic acid consumption to be less than the level for unmetabolized folic acid seems prudent for anyone with an MTHFR variant. If you don’t get enough folate through your diet, methylfolate is a better option for supplementation than folic acid.
Foods high in folate:
Including foods that are high in natural folate is important for overall health. Higher folate foods include legumes, green leafy vegetables, asparagus, avocado, and liver. Stacking a few of those together in your diet can provide the 400 mcg of folate recommended each day — without needing to add foods fortified with folic acid.
Extras for Members:
The rest of this article is for Genetic Lifehacks members only. Consider joining today to see the rest of this article.
Should everyone with MTHFR or DHFR variants stop eating foods fortified with folic acid?
Related Articles and Topics:
Riboflavin (Vitamin B2)
Riboflavin (vitamin B2) is a water-soluble vitamin that is a cofactor for many enzymes in the body. It is vitally important for energy production in the mitochondria and is also a key component of your body’s detoxification system. Some people may need more riboflavin due to MTHFR or FMO3 genetic variants. (Member’s article)
Fish for DHA & EPA
We all vary in how well we convert the plant-based omega-3 oils into the DHA and EPA that our body needs. Some people are really poor at this conversion and thus should either eat more fish or consider taking a DHA / EPA supplement.
Article originally published in June 2016. Updated and republished in April 2019.
Debbie Moon is the founder of Genetic Lifehacks. Fascinated by the connections between genes, diet, and health, her goal is to help you understand how to apply genetics to your diet and lifestyle decisions. Debbie has a BS in engineering and also an MSc in biological sciences from Clemson University. Debbie combines an engineering mindset with a biological systems approach to help you understand how genetic differences impact your optimal health.